Archive for the ‘government news’ Category

Rockefeller Introduces Bill to Ban Misleading Internet Sales Practices Uncovered By E-Commerce Investigation

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

WASHINGTON, DC — Senator John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, today introduced legislation, the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, to end the deceptive online sales tactics which have been the subject of a year-long Commerce Committee investigation.

Chairman Rockefeller’s bill comes on the heels of a new Commerce Committee staff report — the second of two reports — which shows how Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty — the companies that used aggressive sales tactics to enroll online consumers in services without their consent — developed policies designed to prevent online consumers from getting their money back when they called to question the mystery charges on their credit and debit cards.

“Tricking consumers into buying goods and services they do not want is completely unacceptable. It’s not ethical, it’s not right, and it is not the way business should be done in America. Our investigation uncovered these misleading practices and, as a result, these companies have been forced to change their ways. That’s good for the millions of Americans who shop online, and it’s the kind of work I will continue to do as Chairman of the Commerce Committee. The bill I’m introducing today will ban these deceptive online sales practices once and for all,” Chairman Rockefeller said.

The first staff report, released in November 2009, revealed how Affinion, Vertue, and Webloyalty used a set of online sales tactics to charge millions of consumers for membership clubs and services the consumers did not want and were unaware they had purchased. The report found that these companies bilked millions of Americans out of more than one billion dollars by partnering with hundreds of legitimate websites that were willing to share their customers’ billing information, including credit and debit card numbers, for financial gain. More information can be found here.

The new Commerce Committee staff report shows what happened when consumers called Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty to get their money back for the services they were unknowingly charged for. Findings of the new report include:

  • Refund Mitigation: In a practice known as “refund mitigation,” the three companies created scripts and policies intended to minimize the amount of money they would have to return to consumers who had inadvertently enrolled in the clubs. For consumers who insisted on refunds, the companies employed a variety of tactics to keep the refund amounts as small as possible, including requiring customers to obtain refunds by completing written affidavits.
  • Magic Words: Each company instructed their call center representatives not to issue refunds to consumers, unless the consumers mentioned certain key words like “attorney general,” “Better Business Bureau,” or “bank representative.” These policies were designed to satisfy those consumers who were most likely to create additional “customer noise” problems and reputational damage for the companies. Consumers who did not mention the “magic words” did not receive full refunds.
  • Multiple Memberships: Because they could encounter the aggressive sales tactics of Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty while shopping on hundreds of different websites, online shoppers were frequently enrolled inadvertently in multiple membership clubs offered by the same company. Consequently, many customers who called Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty to cancel one membership and request a refund were actually enrolled in more than one of the companies’ clubs. Webloyalty and Vertrue trained their agents not to inform consumers about these additional memberships.
  • Failure to Follow Credit Card Rules: Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty violated MasterCard and Visa’s rules for credit card and debit card transactions and American Express placed the companies in monitoring programs for merchants with high rates of disputed charges from cardholders (known as “chargebacks”). Between 2006 and 2008, the three largest credit card companies processed 1.4 million chargeback requests and over 10 million refunds, totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, from cardholders disputing charges from Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty. Despite these rule violations and the high volume of consumer complaints, the three companies enjoyed uninterrupted access to the payment systems operated by Visa, MasterCard, and American Express until late 2009. Once Chairman Rockefeller notified the credit card companies of the aggressive online sales tactics in December 2009, the companies quickly took action to ensure that Affinion, Vertrue, Webloyalty, and their e-commerce partners were in compliance with their rules for merchants and that their cardholders were no longer subject to the misleading “data pass” process.

Chairman Rockefeller’s bill will help put an end to the deceptive online sales tactics uncovered by the Commerce Committee’s landmark E-commerce investigation. The bill is sponsored by Senators Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and George LeMieux (R-Fla.). Chairman Rockefeller’s bill will protect online shoppers by:

  • Prohibiting companies like Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty from using misleading post-transaction advertisements by requiring them to clearly disclose the terms of the offers to consumers, and to obtain consumers’ billing information, including full credit or debit card numbers, directly from the consumers.
  • Prohibiting Internet retailers and other commercial websites (“initial merchants”) from transferring a consumer’s billing information, including credit and debit card numbers, to post-transaction third party sellers, like Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty.
  • Requiring companies that use “negative options” on the Internet to meet certain minimum disclosure and enrollment requirements, so consumers will not end up paying recurring fees for goods and services they did not intend to purchase.

###

Senate Approves Debit-Card Swipe-Fee Limits in Bill

Monday, May 17th, 2010

U.S. Senate lawmakers handed a victory to retailers over the issue of so-called “swipe fees” for card transactions Thursday evening (yesterday), as antibank fervor continued to play a heavy role in shaping broader regulatory overhaul legislation. Senators voted 64-33 in favor of a measure offered by Sen. Richard Durbin (D., Ill.) that would allow the Federal Reserve to regulate fees on debit card transactions, as well as allow retailers more leverage in negotiating with credit card firms and banks over the fees for card transactions. Nearly 20 Republicans voted to support the measure. The vote sent card companies falling, with Visa Inc. (V) down 7.9% to $79 and Mastercard Inc. (MA) down 7.3% to $215.30, and with Discover Financial Services (DFS) of 2.8% to $14.37 and Capital One Financial Corp. (COF) down 2.6% to $43.75.

 

BIG CHANGE

The amendment permits retailers to offer discounts for cash, checks or debit cards, or for a particular card brand, and would let merchants set minimums and maximums for credit-card purchases, a practice that is currently against card association rules.

IRS proposes changes to 6050W Internal Revenue Code

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

Information Reporting of Payments Made in Settlement of Payment Card and Third Party Network Transactions

The new reporting requirements are in section 6050W of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code), which was added by section 3091 of the Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008, Div. C of Pub. L. No. 110-289, 122 Stat. 2653 (the Act). Section 6050W requires information returns to be made for each calendar year by merchant acquiring entities and third party settlement organizations with respect to payments made in settlement of payment card transactions and third party payment network transactions occurring in that calendar year. This requirement to make information returns applies to returns for calendar years beginning after December 31, 2010.

IRS OFFICIAL BULLETIN Links

December 2009

Proposed Regulations on Payment Card Transactions

May 2009

Information Reporting of Payments Made in Settlement of Payment Card and Third Party Network Transactions

Taxpayer Identification Number (“TIN”) Matching Program Is Available to Persons Required to Make Returns Under New Section 6050W of the Internal Revenue Code

EXCERPTS: Announcement 2009-6

Table of Contents

The Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008, Div. C of Pub. L. No. 110-289, 122 Stat. 2653 (the “Act”), enacted on July 30, 2008, added section 6050W to the Internal Revenue Code. This new section requires information returns to be made for each calendar year by merchant acquiring entities and third party settlement organizations with respect to payment card transactions and third party payment network transactions occurring in that calendar year. This requirement to make information returns applies to returns for calendar years beginning after December 31, 2010.

Section 3406(a)(1) requires certain payors to perform backup withholding by deducting and withholding income tax from a reportable payment if the payee fails to furnish the payee’s taxpayer identification number (“TIN”) to the payor on a required return, or if the Secretary notifies the payor that the TIN furnished by the payee is incorrect. The Act amended section 3406(b)(3) by expanding the meaning of “other reportable payments” that are subject to backup withholding to include payments that are required to be shown on an information return under section 6050W. Backup withholding for amounts reportable under section 6050W applies to amounts paid after December 31, 2011. The Act also amended section 6724(d) by adding returns required by section 6050W to the definition of information returns for purposes of penalties for failure to comply with certain information reporting requirements.

The Act further provides that, solely for purposes of carrying out TIN matching under section 3406, section 6050W is effective on the date of enactment, July 30, 2008. The TIN matching program described in Rev. Proc. 2003-9, 2003-1 C.B. 516, permits program participants to verify the payee TINs required to be reported on information returns and payee statements. Prior to making an information return, a participant may check the TIN furnished by the payee against the name/TIN combination contained in the IRS’s database maintained for the program, and the IRS will inform the participant whether or not the name/TIN combination furnished by the payee matches a name/TIN combination in the database. The matching information provided to participants will help avoid TIN errors and reduce the number of backup withholding notices required under section 3406(a)(1)(B) of the Code. A verified TIN/name match will also provide participants with reasonable cause relief from penalties under section 6724(a).

Accordingly, persons who will be required to make returns under section 6050W may now match TINs under the procedures established by Rev. Proc. 2003-9.

The principal author of this announcement is Barbara M. Pettoni of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration). For further information regarding this announcement, please contact Barbara M. Pettoni at (202) 622-4910 (not a toll-free call). For technical information about, or problems with, the TIN matching program, please call 1-866-255-0654.