Here’s a sneak preview of two innovations that will improve your EBITDA in 2012 with very little effort by your legal staff. The first improves billable time data capture and the second enhances payment acceptance with a flexible PCI Compliant solution, while mitigating risk.

Capture more billable time with a new innovative mobile time tracker that enables you to capture and assign billable time by matter code and client. A key feature is the pop-up on incoming calls; when you hang up, you can immediately assign the call to a client for billing and even enter notes. The length of call is prefilled for you. This data is all accessible back in the office via a web based dashboard.

Expense record on mobile device. Assign and submit billable/ reimbursable expenses on the go.

Our  innovative payment gateway works with your existing payment processors, creating numerous efficiencies, increasing cash flow, and reducing the cost of payment acceptance. Partners will have unprecedented access to client billing and payment data based on permissions granted. Clients will have new ways to receive invoices and make payments. Finance staff will have tools to automate processes and control payment processing costs. You’re in control of the most flexible, scalable payment solution available today.

We’ve been too busy bringing clients on board to create comprehensive marketing materials; technology is ready for immediate implementation. Payment Modules include: virtual terminal, batch upload, Electronic Bill Presentment & Payment (EBPP), Dashboard Reporting, report writer, shopping cart and pay page.

Legal Payment Brochure (pdf Download) . This one page document will be updated in the future.

Join clients listed in the 2011 U.S. News – Best Lawyers ‘Best Law Firm’ Rankings. Contact us now to find out why they chose our technology.

Is it any surprise that actual Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard (DSS) assessments by Verizon’s team of Qualified Security Assessors (QSAs) shows growth of compliance is stagnant? Even worse, organizations that suffered data breaches were much less likely to be compliant than a normal population of PCI clients? About 20 percent of organizations passed less than half of the DSS requirements, while 60 percent scored above the 80 percent mark. For all those merchants sounding off about an annual PCI Compliance Fee, the evidence is clear that merchants still have a long ways to go. 100% PCI DSS compliance is the only acceptable statistic.

Organizations struggled most with the following PCI requirements:

• 3 (protect stored cardholder data)
• 10 (track and monitor access)
• 11 (regularly test systems and processes)
• 12 (maintain security policies)

The first two of these can easily be resolved with our hosted payment processing technology, CenPOS. If you’re going to store cardholder data, it needs to be encrypted. One of the major problems with this has been ready access to solutions for storing cardholder data for variable billing. Most gateways have a PCI Compliant solution to store encrypted card data for recurring billing,  charging the same amount on a fixed schedule. However, CenPOS is unique to offer storing card data for billing a variable amount, token billing. Additionally, it is the only technology this writer is aware of that also includes interchange optimization, of major importance to companies trying to control credit card processing fees.

Tokens are issed for stored card data, worthless if stolen.

Requirement 10 (Tracking and Monitoring) is a major component of CenPOS. Every user has a unique login and management can micro manage permissions. Where others create a few tiered levels of permission such as cashier, finance, and administrator, CenPOS offers a plethora of options, plus management tracking and research tools.

• User Permissions: Control precise transaction types allowed, set maximum thresholds, set alerts based on responses, amounts and other criteria. Extensive Permissions enable maximum merchant protection from lower level employees, plus there are tools for secondary oversight at the admin level to mitigate risk of high level employee fraud.
• Tracking and Monitoring: The requirement calls for the tracking and monitoring of all access to network resources and cardholder data, the main objective is to maintain system logs and have procedures that ensure proper utilization, protection, and retention. According to the Verizon Report, this has historically been one of the most challenging, but is critical to forensic investigations if needed. CenPOS logs everything related to the payments process including user ID, time stamps and every other element of interaction with the system. Merchants must have their own internal logging system for their network.

Requirement 11 (Regular Testing) had the least compliance in the Verizon report. “Organizations continue to have difficulty meeting the sub-requirements regarding network vulnerability scanning (11.2), penetration testing (11.3), and file integrity monitoring (11.5).”  Our recommendation is that merchants hire a qualified outside vendor to assist them with this requirement. We have no direct affiliation with such companies but know several with good reputations should you need a resource.

Requirement 12 (Security Policies) While the best laid written plans may exist, there is still the human factor. Weaknesses identified include poorly written policies, including so long that they are stuffed in a desk never to be read again, and those that are too vague. Note that the requirements are directly related to the services in scope of the organization’s PCI DSS. The more the merchant reduces their scope, the more the burden is on their service provider instead of their internal personnel. CenPOS reduces the merchant scope in several ways, including but not limited to:

• Web payments on a hosted pay page, not the merchants web page
• Electronic Bill Presentment and Payment- same as above.
• Storing all card data, encrypted, on CenPOS servers, eliminating file drawer and merchant stored data

Verizon 2011 PAYMENT CARD INDUSTRY COMPLIANCE REPORT (PDF) download

Learn more about how CenPOS can help you with PCI DSS Compliance.

Does your company record calls for quality assurance or other purposes? The PCI Security Standards Council has issued supplemental guidelines “Protecting Telephone-based Payment Card Data” for you to maintain PCI DSS ( Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards) compliance. The intent is to provide supplemental guidance, and does not replace or supersede PCI DSS requirements.
Why Telephone Card Payment Security is Important
In face-to-face and e-commerce environments, risk-mitigating technologies have helped significantly reduce fraud rates, resulting in a shift of card fraud towards the Mail Order / Telephone Order (MOTO) space. Additionally, a number of regulatory bodies are requiring some companies to record and store telephone conversations in a range of situations. The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), however, stipulates that the three-digit or four-digit card verification code or value printed on the card (CVV2, CVC2, CID, or CAV2) cannot be retained after authorization, and full primary account numbers (PANs) cannot be kept without further protection measures.

As such, there is a risk that organizations taking customer payment card details over the telephone may be recording the full cardholder details to comply with various regulatory bodies, thereby causing them to be in contravention of PCI DSS requirements and potentially exposing cardholder data to unnecessary risk.

Recap: The PCI SSC FAQ
PCI SSC FAQ 5362 – Are audio/voice recordings containing cardholder data and/or sensitive authentication data included in the scope of PCI DSS?
This response is intended to provide clarification for call centers that record cardholder data in audio recordings, and applies only to the storage of card validation codes and values (referred to as CAV2, CVC2, CVV2 or CID codes by the payment brands).
It is a violation of PCI DSS Requirement 3.2 to store any sensitive authentication data, including card validation codes and values, after authorization even if encrypted.
It is therefore prohibited to use any form of digital audio recording (using formats such as WAV, MP3, etc.) for storing CAV2, CVC2, CVV2 or CID codes after authorization if that data can be queried; recognizing that multiple tools exist that potentially could query a variety of digital recordings.
Where technology exists to prevent recording of these data elements, such technology should be enabled. If these recordings cannot be data-mined, storage of CAV2, CVC2, CVV2 or CID codes after authorization may be permissible as long as appropriate validation has been performed. This includes the physical and logical protections defined in PCI DSS that must still be applied to these call-recording formats.

August 2011 chart from PCI Security Standards

Note: Encrypting sensitive authentication data is not by itself sufficient to render the data non-queriable.
For data to be considered “non-queriable” it must not be feasible for general users of the system or malicious users that gain access to the system to retrieve or access the data. Access to the types of functions listed above must be extremely limited, explicitly authorized, documented, and actively monitored. Additionally, controls must be in place to prevent unauthorized access to these functions.
Other methods that may help to render SAD non-queriable include but are not limited to: a. Removing call recordings from the call recording solution b.    Taking the call recordings offline c.    Vaulting the call recordings d.    Enforcing dual access controls to the vaulted call recordings e.    Allowing only single call recordings to be retrieved from vaults

Before considering this option, every possible effort must first be made to eliminate sensitive authentication data. In general, no cardholder data should ever be stored unless it is necessary to meet the needs of the business. There must be a documented, legitimate reason why sensitive authentication data cannot be eliminated (for example, a legislative or regulatory obligation), and a comprehensive risk assessment performed at least annually. The detailed justification and risk assessment results must be made available to the acquiring bank and/or payment card brand as applicable. This option is a last resort only, and the desired outcome is always the elimination of all sensitive authentication data after authorization.    If technologies are available to fulfil PCI DSS requirements without contravening government laws and regulations, these technologies should be used.

The PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) is not responsible for enforcing compliance or determining whether a particular implementation is compliant. It is the primary recommended source for all merchants to obtain current PCI DSS information.

Download the complete report here
PCI Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) Protecting Telephone-based Payment Card Data

May brings the usual April interchange update. There are two noticeable bumps for MasterCard. An overall assessment increase to .012% for all transactions over $1000, and up to .04% more for WorldCard. Full article and link to 2011 Interchange Rates and Criteria.

BUSINESS CREDIT CARDS: The typical interchange rate to merchants for corporate cards is 2.2% or 2.4%.  The non-qualified rate is a whopping 3.17% on MasterCard, which can be avoided with proper interchange management. Depending on your business type, you may qualify for large ticket (minimum $1000) rates which can save you up to 1%. To manage these business card fees, check your merchant statement PENDING INTERCHANGE CHARGES to see what rates you’re hitting. If your eyes glaze over at the complexity of interchange fees, merchant discounts etc, read the 3D Merchant Services blog or email a request to be included in our next interchange insights webinar. TIP: With our payment platform you can automatically offer discounts to your customers if they use lower cost debit cards.

MOBILE PAYMENTS: We’ve officially launched our app for iphone, itouch and ipad. This enables you obtain swipe rates from the field, including signature capture or you can key enter. Receipts are emailed to customers. For service companies, you can swipe the card the first time, then re-bill via a secure token for subsequent charges. In both cases you qualify for the lowest rate, plus mitigate risk with the initial swipe. Droid is available for key entry only, with retail swipe coming by June 30.

Payment Card Industry (PCI) COMPLIANCE AND DATA SECURITY: The number of 2010 data breaches exploded in companies with 11 to 100 employees. A key commonality is simply the opportunity was there. Read the full 2011 Data Breach report which includes insider theft so you can identify your own weaknesses and take corrective action. Your company is not PCI Compliant and protected under Safe Harbor unless you can prove you’ve been compliant continually, not just when you completed an annual report. Trust me, all parties will look for ways for you to assume the full burden of costs associated with any data breach.  Every operation I visit or speak to has weaknesses so please put this on your priority list!. Need help? Call and lets discuss.

What’s in your merchant statements?  Multiple locations are now achieving over 90% pin debit penetration using our universal processing platform, CenPOS. Way to go!

In this first article of a series we explore insider theft, related to data breaches,  based on key elements of the Verizon 2011 data breach report.  The number of 2010 data breaches exploded in companies with 11 to 100 employees. A key commonality is simply the opportunity was there.

The 2011 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) is a study conducted by the Verizon RISK team in cooperation with the U.S. Secret Service and the Dutch High Tech Crime Unit.

Who is behind the data breaches?

• 92% external agents
• 17% implicated insiders
• < 1% business partners
• 9% involved multiple parties

How do breaches occur? ?

• 50% involved some sort of hacking
• 49% incorporated malware
• 29% physical attacks
• 17% from privilege misuse
• 11% employe social tactics

What commonalities exist?

• 83% were victims of opportunity
• 92% were not difficult
• 76% of all data was compromised from servers
• 86% discovered by a third party
• 96% were avoidable through simple or intermediate controls
• 89% of victims subject to PCI-DSS had not achieved compliance

End of excerpt. Continue reading for blog author comments.

A healthcare company stores credit card data on servers, unencrpyted. Their excuse? It’s not connected to the actual credit card processing and access is restricted so it’s not a PCI Compliance problem.  See related article Shocking lack of payment processing security in healthcare industry. No data breach yet, but statistically, the company is at great financial risk, including up to  $1.5 million fine for violating the HITECH ACT.

Employees at a car dealer tape passwords next to their computer and in the first unlocked drawer of their desk. Their excuse?  It’s too hard to remember the password and they don’t acknowledge it’s a security issue.

Employees at a retail rental shop have a file folder in plain view of anyone entering the shop containing copies of drivers licenses and the front and back of credit cards. Their excuse? They didn’t know they couldn’t do it and didn’t know of an alternative method that would meet their needs to bill customers if they never returned with the goods.

Think these are exceptions? Businesses everywhere have these problems in some fashion. As each of these examples illustrate,  employee training is essential. Industry wide, merchants are completing  PCI Compliance Security Standards data worksheets. At that point in time, the merchant can be certified PCI Compliant. But without internal enforcement and training, the merchant is generally not compliant when a data breach occurs and thus is fully liable for all the associated fines, fees and damages.

In conclusion, the establishment of training procedures and distribution of data security expectations to employees is essential. Most employees are honest, right? But when companies have lax security policies, it presents an OPPORTUNITY for good employees to break the law.

Here’s three things you can do to mitigate internal employee risk:

1. Create a data security training checklist for all employees handling sensitive data. Update the training and content quarterly or at least once per year. The employee cannot accept credit cards or any sensitive data until they’ve completed training, plus sign and date the checklist.
2. Make data security a formal part of employee performance reviews. Require annual checklist review and signature at the time of performance reviews.
3. Implement a reward system for identifying vulnerabilities of real life practices- whether people, software, or hardware.

Bonus: Implement a hosted payment processing solution with extensive tools to prevent internal fraud. Call for information.

There’s room for improvement in medical billing for card not present transactions. The lack of security in the healthcare industry with respect to payment processing is evident in nearly every business I’ve interviewed in the last two years. With all the effort put into HIPAA, you’d think they’d be more likely to be PCI Compliant than other industries, but in my experience talking to and interacting with healthcare  companies, I think 50% PCI DSS  (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards) Compliance would be extremely optimistic.

So what’s got my gander up today? A widespread lack of security by healthcare suppliers with my HSA debit card data. Before giving out my credit card information, I always ask what they are going to do with it.  As a cardholder, I have a right to know. Like many Americans, I have an HSA account and funds for payments are accessible only via a debit card. That means any misuse could wipe out the account.  Under Visa’s Zero Liability policy  consumers are not held responsible for fraudulent charges made with the card or account information, but identity theft is another matter the consumer is left to deal with.

I talked to three different personnel for the story that follows. The last one said the first two didn’t entirely follow normal protocol, which does nothing to spare them from the liabilities associated with identity theft.

This article is about a medical industry merchant storing credit card data in a database and the misunderstanding of potential  liability exposure as a result. Storing card data even for 24 hours poses a huge risk both financially and criminally. In this article we’ll review their processes and solutions to mitigate risk.

First, let’s review the payments process.  Consumers receive invoices in the mail. They can mail a check or pay by Visa or MasterCard by returning a form, or call on the phone. The merchant then uses a multi-step process to collect the information and process it.

PAY INVOICE BY MAIL

This invoice format is quite common for medical billing.

RISK: Merchant collects the CVV code, listed as signature code above, and bills are sent to a their corporate office. Collecting and storing CVV codes is always a bad idea. The mail could be stolen by internal employees familiar with the billing process. Someone could copy or even quickly photo each billing form. It’s doubtful they could prove PCI Compliance and would likely have no safe harbor in the event of a data breach.

SOLUTION: Remove the security code from the form. Have all bills sent to a lockbox. Reduce mail payments by enabling customers to pay their bills online.

PAY INVOICE BY PHONE

The first person to take my payment was covering for someone who was on vacation or otherwise out of the office.

• She took down my invoice number and credit card information on a piece of paper. She entered something into their billing system so there was  a record of my call and payment.
• The paper went into an “in box”. It was Friday.
• The person emptying the “in box” and posting payments would be in Monday to complete the transaction.
• Monday the posting person key entered the transaction into a desktop terminal.
• Tuesday, presumably,  paper was shredded. The paper is held for a day to ensure the payment went through properly so the customer does not need to be called.

RISK:  The paper with full card data was exposed for up to 5 days. Was the ‘in box’ emptied and put in a locked drawer when not being worked on, including breaks? Do cleaning personnel have access to the facility on evenings and weekends?

SOLUTION: Enter the card information directly into our smart virtual terminal. Some flexible options include:

• Entering the card and customer data and instantly charging the account. In this case, you can enter the CVV for extra fraud protection.
• Creating a customer and entering the card information for later billing. Using a process called tokenization, the card data is stored encrypted on PCI Compliant servers, never at the merchant location.  CVV is NEVER stored, not even encrypted, since it’s against card association rules.
• Entering the card and customer information and obtaining an authorization only, for other personnel to charge later.

The seccond person to take my payment on a future date was the actual representative for my account.

• She entered information in the billing system so there was  a record of my call and payment.
• My card data, including CVV,  was entered into a ‘notes’ section of the billing database.
• The customer service representative has no access to see the card data after it is entered.
• An accounting person retrieves the card data for payment in bulk with others within 1 business day.
• The posting person key enters the transaction into a dial-up desktop terminal.
• The next business day, presumably,  the computer notes are deleted.

RISK:  Full card data is exposed on a computer network. It doesn’t matter that access is restricted to certain personnel. This data storage is certainly a violation of FACTA and PCI Compliance standards, and probably HIPAA too. The merchant is open to both criminal and financial penalties in the event of a data breach. Additionally, the merchant would need to securely wipe or destroy every associated hard drive removed from service in the future to eliminate data theft potential.

SOLUTION: Enter the card information directly into our smart virtual terminal, same as above.

What are the financial risks with this data exposure?

• Replacement cost per card compromised, $25.
• Mandatory consumer credit report service for one year, $12/mth per card holder.
• Reimburse all claims from card associations.
• Fines from FACTA, HIPAA, and PCI Compliance violations
• Your business could come to a screeching halt while a forensics team investigates.
• Bad PR could result in loss of business.

What are the criminal risks associated with card data exposure? Felony.

FINAL NOTES: There is some use of an online gateway within the organization, but those details are unknown. I spoke to staff that believes since the payment processing is via a dial up terminal and is not connected to the card data in the database, that there is no risk. That is completely untrue. The company would not only save time by reducing steps, but would tremendously reduce risk by key entering card data directly into a virtual terminal. Moreover, an intelligent VT would provide a boatload of other benefits.

Ignorance is not an excuse. PCI Compliance standards were established nearly a decade ago. A critical first step to compliance and mitigating risk is a solution that supports all your payment processing needs. We offer that solution.

See also related article, How to reduce time and money for outpatient procedure billing.

On a side note, based on the invoice billing form, the merchant is not accepting American Express cards, probably because they don’t want to pay the high fees associated with Amex. If managing costs to improve EBITDA is important, our hosted payment processing platform with intelligent switch is critical.

Cyber Criminals Shifting to Smaller, More Opportunistic Attacks; External Attacks, Especially Hacking, on Rise

April 19, 2011

NEW YORK – Data loss through cyber attacks decreased sharply in 2010, but the total number of breaches was higher than ever, according to the “Verizon 2011 Data Breach Investigations Report.” These findings continue to demonstrate that businesses and consumers must remain vigilant in implementing and maintaining security practices.

The number of compromised records involved in data breaches investigated by Verizon and the U.S. Secret Service dropped from 144 million in 2009 to only 4 million in 2010, representing the lowest volume of data loss since the report’s launch in 2008. Yet this year’s report covers approximately 760 data breaches, the largest caseload to date.

According to the report, the seeming contradiction between the low data loss and the high number of breaches likely stems from a significant decline in large-scale breaches, caused by a change in tactics by cybercriminals. They are engaging in small, opportunistic attacks rather than large-scale, difficult attacks and are using relatively unsophisticated methods to successfully penetrate organizations. For example, only 3 percent of breaches were considered unavoidable without extremely difficult or expensive corrective action.

The report also found that outsiders are responsible for 92 percent of breaches, a significant increase from the 2010 findings. Although the percentage of insider attacks decreased significantly over the previous year (16 percent versus 49 percent), this is largely due to the huge increase in smaller external attacks. As a result, the total number of insider attacks actually remained relatively constant.

Hacking (50 percent) and malware (49 percent) were the most prominent types of attack, with many of those attacks involving weak or stolen credentials and passwords. For the first time, physical attacks — such as compromising ATMs –appeared as one of the three most common ways to steal information, and constituted 29 percent of all cases investigated.

For the second year in a row, the U.S. Secret Service collaborated with Verizon in preparing the report. In addition, the National High Tech Crime Unit of the Netherlands Policy Agency (KLPD) joined the team this year, allowing Verizon to provide more insight into cases originating in Europe. Approximately one-third of Verizon’s cases originated in either Europe or the Asia-Pacific region, reflecting the global nature of data breaches.

“Through our Data Breach Investigations Report series, Verizon continues to provide the industry with a first-hand look at cybercrime around the globe,” said Peter Tippett, Verizon’s vice president of security and industry solutions. “This year, we witnessed highly automated and prolific external attacks, low and slow attacks, intricate internal fraud rings, countrywide device-tampering schemes, cunning social engineering plots and more. And yet, at the end of day, we found once again that the vast majority of breaches can be avoided without extremely difficult, expensive security measures.”

Tippett added: “It is important to remember that data breaches can happen to any business — regardless of size or industry — or consumer, at any place in the world. A good offense remains the best defense. It is imperative to implement essential security measures broadly throughout your security infrastructure, whether that is a small home setup or an expansive enterprise infrastructure.”

U.S. Secret Service Assistant Director A.T. Smith said, “Americans over the past several years have seen the significant impacts data breaches are having on our nation’s financial infrastructure. Today cyber criminals are operating in nearly every civilized nation in the world, exposing Americans’ personal information, either stored or transmitted, to substantial risk.”

Smith added, “By participating in the Verizon 2011 Data Breach Investigations Report, the Secret Service is working closely with our private-sector partners to educate Americans about the threats of cyber criminals. With the help of our Electronic Crimes Task Force partners, such as Verizon, we are studying technologies and trends to prevent and mitigate attacks against critical financial infrastructure.”

The Data Breach Investigation Report (DBIR) series now spans seven years and more than 1,700 breaches involving more than 900 million compromised records, making it the most comprehensive study of its kind.

(NOTE: Additional resources supporting the 2011 Data Breach Investigations Report are available, including high-resolution charts and an audio podcast. B-roll available upon request.)

Key Findings of the 2011 Report

Data from the 2011 report shows that:

• Large-scale breaches dropped dramatically while small attacks increased. The report notes there are several possible reasons for this trend, including the fact that small to medium-sized businesses represent prime attack targets for many hackers, who favor highly automated, repeatable attacks against these more vulnerable targets, possibly because criminals are opting to play it safe in light of recent arrests and prosecutions of high-profile hackers.
• Outsiders are responsible for most data breaches. Ninety-two percent of data breaches were caused by external sources. Contrary to the malicious-employee stereotype, insiders were responsible for only 16 percent of attacks. Partner-related attacks continued to decline, and business partners accounted for less than 1 percent of breaches.
• Physical attacks are on the rise. After doubling as a percentage of all breaches in 2009, attacks involving physical actions doubled again in 2010, and included manipulating common credit-card devices such as ATMs, gas pumps and point-of-sale terminals. The data indicates that organized crime groups are responsible for most of these card-skimming schemes.
• Hacking and malware is the most popular attack method. Malware was a factor in about half of the 2010 caseload and was responsible for almost 80 percent of lost data. The most common kinds of malware found in the caseload were those involving sending data to an external entity, opening backdoors, and keylogger functionalities.
• Stolen passwords and credentials are out of control. Ineffective, weak or stolen credentials continue to wreak havoc on enterprise security. Failure to change default credentials remains an issue, particularly in the financial services, retail and hospitality industries.

Recommendations for Enterprises

The 2011 report found again that the prescription for data breaches is to use simple, essential security practices such as:

• Focus on essential controls. Many enterprises make the mistake of pursuing exceptionally high security in certain areas while almost completely neglecting others. Businesses are much better protected if they implement essential controls across the entire organization without exception.
• Eliminate unnecessary data. If you do not need it, do not keep it. For data that must be kept, identify, monitor and securely store it.
• Secure remote access services. Restrict these services to specific IP addresses and networks, minimizing public access to them. Also, ensure that your enterprise is limiting access to sensitive information within the network.
• Audit user accounts and monitor users with privileged identity. The best approach is to trust users but monitor them through pre-employment screening, limiting user privileges and using separation of duties. Managers should provide direction, as well as supervise employees to ensure they are following security policies and procedures.
• Monitor and mine event logs. Focus on the obvious issues that logs pick up, not the minutia. Reducing the compromise-to-discovery timeframe from weeks and months to days can pay huge dividends.
• Be aware of physical security assets. Pay close attention to payment card input devices, such as ATMs and gas pumps, for tampering and manipulation.

A complete copy of the “Data Breach Investigations Report” is available for download.

About Verizon
Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE, NASDAQ:VZ), headquartered in New York, is a global leader in delivering broadband and other wireless and wireline communications services to mass market, business, government and wholesale customers. Verizon Wireless operates America’s most reliable wireless network, serving 94.1 million customers nationwide. Verizon also provides converged communications, information and entertainment services over America’s most advanced fiber-optic network, and delivers innovative, seamless business solutions to customers around the world. A Dow 30 company, Verizon employs a diverse workforce of more than 194,000 and last year generated consolidated revenues of $106.6 billion. For more information, visit www.verizon.com.

At Holy Cross Hospital, technicians discovered that Emergency room employee Natashi Orr, 36, had printed basic computerized forms in patient files containing name, address, birth date, diagnosis and other details, officials said. Raushanah Bowleg, 33, Opa-locka, did the same on his job at an Aventura physician office.

At another hospital, the intake process requires all data be entered in the computer directly, and an electronic signature is captured. Yet to accept payment, the cashier walks to another area, out of view from the consumer, and next to a copier.  During this time the card could have been skimmed for the magnetic data or a copy made of the card, both posing considerable risk of identity theft.

While the latter situation has not resulted in a data compromise to my knowledge, the situation is equally dangerous.

3D Merchant Services has a payment processing solution with enhanced features created specifically for hospitals and medical billing companies. Here are a few highlights:

- User level security. Modify, add, and delete users and their permission levels for processing payments for phone/mail and in person. Combined with alerts and other features, prevent internal and external fraud.
- Tokenization. Would you like to re-bill a customer on their initial payment method? Set up recurring billing? Without storing their credit card data? Create a secure token to enable repeat billing. Even if stolen, the tokens are worthless.
- Least cost routing – Attach a signature capture terminal to your PC’s and eliminate human errors that create costly interchange (95% of your payment processing cost) downgrades, plus dynamically determines least cost method to process.

- Reporting. The number one reason CFO’s cite as the reason for implementing immediately. From downloadable financial data to dynamically created graphic reports that quickly show risk mitigation and treasury reports by organization or location, solution delivers what you want, when you want it.
There is no other technology on the market positively impacting compliance, costs, and fraud like this, which is why 98% of organizations that see a demo implement it.

Our solution can be integrated with traditional medical billing and intake systems. The technology platform sits in front of the existing processor.

See also related articles  virtual terminal for medical billing solutions providers and Red Flags Rule for Identity Theft Prevention Programs.